TY - JOUR
T1 - A Critical Review on Structural Health Monitoring
T2 - Definitions, Methods, and Perspectives
AU - Gharehbaghi, Vahid Reza
AU - Noroozinejad Farsangi, Ehsan
AU - Noori, Mohammad
AU - Yang, T. Y.
AU - Li, Shaofan
AU - Nguyen, Andy
AU - Málaga-Chuquitaype, Christian
AU - Gardoni, Paolo
AU - Mirjalili, Seyedali
N1 - Funding Information:
In Europe, some collaborative projects on SHM have been organized. For instance, by the Ministry of Scientific Research and Technology (MURST) in Italy, and the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), in the UK []. Two primary schemes for cooperative research are the EC Framework Program projects and the EUREKA projects.
Funding Information:
The majority of research projects in the USA, in this regard, have been supported by National Science Foundation (NSF), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), or other universities and laboratories such as LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), National Aeronautics, and Space Administration (NASA), United States Air Force (USAF), California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), and Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) among others.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The benefits of tracking, identifying, measuring features of interest from structure responses have endless applications for saving cost, time and improving safety. To date, structural health monitoring (SHM) has been extensively applied in several fields, such as aerospace, automotive, and mechanical engineering. However, the focus of this paper is to provide a comprehensive up-to-date review of civil engineering structures such as buildings, bridges, and other infrastructures. For this reason, this article commences with a concise introduction to the fundamental definitions of SHM. The next section presents the general concepts and factors that determine the best strategy to be employed for SHM. Afterward, a thorough review of the most prevalent anomaly detection approaches, from classic techniques to advanced methods, is presented. Subsequently, some popular benchmarks, including laboratory specimens and real structures for validating the proposed methodologies, are demonstrated and discussed. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of each method are summarized, which can be helpful in future studies.
AB - The benefits of tracking, identifying, measuring features of interest from structure responses have endless applications for saving cost, time and improving safety. To date, structural health monitoring (SHM) has been extensively applied in several fields, such as aerospace, automotive, and mechanical engineering. However, the focus of this paper is to provide a comprehensive up-to-date review of civil engineering structures such as buildings, bridges, and other infrastructures. For this reason, this article commences with a concise introduction to the fundamental definitions of SHM. The next section presents the general concepts and factors that determine the best strategy to be employed for SHM. Afterward, a thorough review of the most prevalent anomaly detection approaches, from classic techniques to advanced methods, is presented. Subsequently, some popular benchmarks, including laboratory specimens and real structures for validating the proposed methodologies, are demonstrated and discussed. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of each method are summarized, which can be helpful in future studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117820598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11831-021-09665-9
DO - 10.1007/s11831-021-09665-9
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85117820598
SN - 1134-3060
JO - Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
JF - Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
ER -