TY - JOUR
T1 - Applying Best Practice Online Learning, Teaching, and Support to Intensive Online Environments
T2 - An Integrative Review
AU - Roddy, Chantal
AU - Amiet, Danielle Lalaine
AU - Chung, Jennifer
AU - Holt, Christopher
AU - Shaw, Lauren
AU - McKenzie, Stephen
AU - Garivaldis, Filia
AU - Lodge, Jason M.
AU - Mundy, Matthew Edward
N1 - Funding Information:
Completion of the current review was funded by the School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University.
Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Professor Kim Cornish and Associate Professor Matthew Mundy for supporting the creation of the Monash Online – Psychology Education Division (MO-PED) team and associated research outputs. The authors also wish to acknowledge funding support supplied via the Monash Pearson Alliance. The team also wishes to thank Leah Braganza and Tony Mowbray for their time in providing feedback on the draft manuscript. Funding. Completion of the current review was funded by the School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2017 Roddy, Amiet, Chung, Holt, Shaw, McKenzie, Garivaldis, Lodge and Mundy.
PY - 2017/11/21
Y1 - 2017/11/21
N2 - Demand for flexible online offerings has continued to increase as prospective students seek to upskill, re-train, and undertake further study. Education institutions are moving to intensive modes of online study delivered in 6- to 8-week study periods which offer more frequent intake periods. Prior literature has established key success factors for non-intensive (12–13 weeks) online offerings; for teachers, skill development is critical to promote a flexible, responsive approach and maintain technological capabilities; for students, an ability to navigate the technology, interact with the learning environment in meaningful ways, and self-regulate learning is important, as the absence of physical infrastructure and opportunities for face-to-face interactions in online environments places a greater emphasis on alternate forms of communication and support. The current paper explores known best practice principles for online instructors, students, and student support and considers how these might apply to intensive online environments. It is suggested that the accelerated nature of learning in intensive settings may place additional demands on students, instructors, and support mechanisms. Further research is imperative to determine predictors of success in online intensive learning environments.
AB - Demand for flexible online offerings has continued to increase as prospective students seek to upskill, re-train, and undertake further study. Education institutions are moving to intensive modes of online study delivered in 6- to 8-week study periods which offer more frequent intake periods. Prior literature has established key success factors for non-intensive (12–13 weeks) online offerings; for teachers, skill development is critical to promote a flexible, responsive approach and maintain technological capabilities; for students, an ability to navigate the technology, interact with the learning environment in meaningful ways, and self-regulate learning is important, as the absence of physical infrastructure and opportunities for face-to-face interactions in online environments places a greater emphasis on alternate forms of communication and support. The current paper explores known best practice principles for online instructors, students, and student support and considers how these might apply to intensive online environments. It is suggested that the accelerated nature of learning in intensive settings may place additional demands on students, instructors, and support mechanisms. Further research is imperative to determine predictors of success in online intensive learning environments.
KW - higher education
KW - intensive online learning
KW - online education
KW - student experience
KW - teacher education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078490651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2017.00059
DO - 10.3389/feduc.2017.00059
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85078490651
VL - 2
JO - Frontiers in Education
JF - Frontiers in Education
SN - 2504-284X
M1 - 59
ER -