Determinants of change in patella cartilage volume in healthy subjects

Fahad Hanna, Anita E. Wluka, Peter R. Ebeling, Richard O'Sullivan, Susan R. Davis, Flavia M. Cicuttini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To examine whether the amount of patella cartilage in healthy, middle-aged subjects is stable or changes over time, and what factors may influence the changes. Methods. Eighty-five subjects (28 men and 57 women, mean age 55.5 yrs) had magnetic resonance imaging of their dominant knee at baseline and 2 years later. Patella and tibial cartilage volume was measured at baseline and followup. Risk factors assessed at baseline were tested for their association with change in patella cartilage volume over time. Results. Mean annual percentage loss of patella cartilage was 2.1 (95% confidence interval: 1.1-3.2; p < 0.001). Age, gender, body mass index, and initial cartilage volume did not affect rate of change of patellar cartilage volume. There was a weak association between change in patellar cartilage volume and change in lateral tibial cartilage volume (R = 0.23, p = 0.03) but not medial tibial cartilage volume (R = 0.09, p = 0.43). Conclusion. In healthy subjects, a significant amount of patella cartilage is lost annually. The poor cor-relation between patella and tibial cartilage loss suggests that pathogenetic mechanisms for osteoarthri-tis in the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint may differ. Further work will be required to determine whether the rate of patella cartilage loss in healthy subjects is steady or phasic, and to determine which factors can be modified to reduce cartilage loss.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1658-1661
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cartilage volume
  • Healthy women
  • Prospective cohort

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of change in patella cartilage volume in healthy subjects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this