TY - JOUR
T1 - General practitioners' perceptions, attitudes and experiences of frailty and frailty screening
AU - C Ambagtsheer, Rachel
AU - M Archibald, Mandy
AU - Lawless, Michael
AU - Mills, David
AU - Yu, Solomon
AU - Beilby, Justin J.
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: General practitioners (GPs) are uniquely positioned to support frailty identification and management. However, awareness of frailty and its treatment remains an emergent concept for many. Consequently, our aim was to explore GPs' perceptions, attitudes and experiences of frailty and frailty screening. METHOD: A qualitative focus group study was conducted with 22 South Australian GPs. GPs were recruited through a combination of purposive, convenience and snowball sampling. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: GPs saw frailty as a cycle of worsening decline punctuated by experience of negative outcomes. Participants largely felt that they already knew who their frail patients were without the need for formal screening. Consequently, there was varied support for formal screening, largely dependent on its intended purpose. Few GPs had actively intervened to prevent the onset or progression of frailty, with most strategies aimed at stabilisation and management. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that Australian GPs may be open to a proactive approach to frailty assessment and treatment, given appropriate training and resources.
AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: General practitioners (GPs) are uniquely positioned to support frailty identification and management. However, awareness of frailty and its treatment remains an emergent concept for many. Consequently, our aim was to explore GPs' perceptions, attitudes and experiences of frailty and frailty screening. METHOD: A qualitative focus group study was conducted with 22 South Australian GPs. GPs were recruited through a combination of purposive, convenience and snowball sampling. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: GPs saw frailty as a cycle of worsening decline punctuated by experience of negative outcomes. Participants largely felt that they already knew who their frail patients were without the need for formal screening. Consequently, there was varied support for formal screening, largely dependent on its intended purpose. Few GPs had actively intervened to prevent the onset or progression of frailty, with most strategies aimed at stabilisation and management. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that Australian GPs may be open to a proactive approach to frailty assessment and treatment, given appropriate training and resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072527814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://doi.org/10.25905/13316051.v1
U2 - 10.31128/AJGP-11-18-4757
DO - 10.31128/AJGP-11-18-4757
M3 - Article
C2 - 31256509
SN - 2208-7958
VL - 48
SP - 426
EP - 433
JO - Australian journal of general practice
JF - Australian journal of general practice
IS - 7
ER -