Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Remote Sensing |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Kernel ridge regression
- Machine learning
- Satellite data
- South Australia
- Wheat yield
- Agricultural machinery
- Ant colony optimization
- Commerce
- Food supply
- Forecasting
- Grain (agricultural product)
- Particle swarm optimization (PSO)
- Regression analysis
- Remote sensing
- Adaptive noise
- Empirical Mode Decomposition
- Gray wolves
- Kernel ridge regressions
- Optimisations
- Regression modelling
- Yield prediction
- Satellites
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Kernel Ridge Regression Hybrid Method for Wheat Yield Prediction with Satellite-Derived Predictors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
Kernel Ridge Regression Hybrid Method for Wheat Yield Prediction with Satellite-Derived Predictors. / Masrur Ahmed, A.A.; Sharma, E.; Janifer Jabin Jui, S. et al.
In: Remote Sensing, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2022.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Kernel Ridge Regression Hybrid Method for Wheat Yield Prediction with Satellite-Derived Predictors
AU - Masrur Ahmed, A.A.
AU - Sharma, E.
AU - Janifer Jabin Jui, S.
AU - Deo, R.C.
AU - Nguyen-Huy, T.
AU - Ali, M.
N1 - Cited By :1 Export Date: 12 July 2022 Correspondence Address: Deo, R.C.; School of Mathematics, Australia; email: ravinesh.deo@usq.edu.au Funding details: University of Southern Queensland, USQ Funding details: Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Funding text 1: Funding: The study was supported by the Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) and the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) USQ-CAS Postgraduate Research Scholarship (2019–2021). References: Pathak, H., Aggarwal, P.K., Singh, S., (2012) Climate Change Impact, Adaptation and Mitigation in Agriculture: Methodology for Assessment and Applications, 302. , Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India; Rosenberg, N.J., Adaptation of agriculture to climate change (1992) Clim. Chang, 21, pp. 385-405; Rickards, L., Howden, S.M., Transformational adaptation: Agriculture and climate change (2012) Crop Pasture Sci, 63, pp. 240-250; Leng, G., Hall, J.W., Predicting spatial and temporal variability in crop yields: An inter-comparison of machine learning, regression and process-based models (2020) Environ. Res. Lett, 15, p. 044027; Iizumi, T., Ramankutty, N., How do weather and climate influence cropping area and intensity? (2015) Glob. Food Secur, 4, pp. 46-50; Ruane, A.C., Major, D.C., Winston, H.Y., Alam, M., Hussain, S.G., Khan, A.S., Hassan, A., Horton, R.M., Multi-factor impact analysis of agricultural production in Bangladesh with climate change (2013) Glob. Environ. Chang, 23, pp. 338-350; Challinor, A.J., Watson, J., Lobell, D.B., Howden, S., Smith, D., Chhetri, N., A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation (2014) Nat. Clim. Chang, 4, pp. 287-291; Olesen, J.E., Bindi, M., Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy (2002) Eur. J. Agron, 16, pp. 239-262; Thornton, P.K., Jones, P.G., Alagarswamy, G., Andresen, J., Spatial variation of crop yield response to climate change in East Africa (2009) Glob. Environ. Chang, 19, pp. 54-65; Alexandrov, V., Hoogenboom, G., The impact of climate variability and change on crop yield in Bulgaria (2000) Agric. For. Meteorol, 104, pp. 315-327; Romeijn, H., Faggian, R., Diogo, V., Sposito, V., Evaluation of deterministic and complex analytical hierarchy process methods for agricultural land suitability analysis in a changing climate (2016) ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf, 5, p. 99; Aschonitis, V., Mastrocicco, M., Colombani, N., Salemi, E., Kazakis, N., Voudouris, K., Castaldelli, G., Assessment of the intrinsic vulnerability of agricultural land to water and nitrogen losses via deterministic approach and regression analysis (2012) Water Air Soil Pollut, 223, pp. 1605-1614; Meenken, E., Wheeler, D., Brown, H., Teixeira, E., Espig, M., Bryant, J., Triggs, C., Framework for uncertainty evaluation and estimation in deterministic agricultural models (2020) Nutr. Manag. Farmed Landsc. Occas. Rep, 33, pp. 1-11; Kingsley, J., Afu, S.M., Isong, I.A., Chapman, P.A., Kebonye, N.M., Ayito, E.O., Estimation of soil organic carbon distribution by geostatistical and deterministic interpolation methods: A case study of the southeastern soils of nigeria (2021) Environ. Eng. Manag. J. EEMJ, 20, pp. 1077-1085; Holman, I., Tascone, D., Hess, T., A comparison of stochastic and deterministic downscaling methods for modelling potential groundwater recharge under climate change in East Anglia, UK: Implications for groundwater resource management (2009) Hydrogeol. J, 17, pp. 1629-1641; Sharma, E., Deo, R.C., Prasad, R., Parisi, A.V., A hybrid air quality early-warning framework: An hourly forecasting model with online sequential extreme learning machines and empirical mode decomposition algorithms (2020) Sci. Total Environ, 709, p. 135934; Sharma, E., Deo, R.C., Prasad, R., Parisi, A.V., Raj, N., Deep Air Quality Forecasts: Suspended Particulate Matter Modeling With Convolutional Neural and Long Short-Term Memory Networks (2020) IEEE Access, 8, pp. 209503-209516; Kouadio, L., Deo, R.C., Byrareddy, V., Adamowski, J.F., Mushtaq, S., Nguyen, V.P., Artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of Robusta coffee yield using soil fertility properties (2018) Comput. Electron. Agric, 155, pp. 324-338; Ren, J., Chen, Z., Zhou, Q., Tang, H., Regional yield estimation for winter wheat with MODIS-NDVI data in Shandong, China (2008) Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf, 10, pp. 403-413; Franch, B., Vermote, E., Becker-Reshef, I., Claverie, M., Huang, J., Zhang, J., Justice, C., Sobrino, J.A., Improving the timeliness of winter wheat production forecast in the United States of America, Ukraine and China using MODIS data and NCAR Growing Degree Day information (2015) Remote Sens. Environ, 161, pp. 131-148; Han, J., Zhang, Z., Cao, J., Luo, Y., Zhang, L., Li, Z., Zhang, J., Prediction of winter wheat yield based on multi-source data and machine learning in China (2020) Remote Sens, 12, p. 236; Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Feng, L., Du, Q., Runge, T., Combining multi-source data and machine learning approaches to predict winter wheat yield in the conterminous United States (2020) Remote Sens, 12, p. 1232; Wang, X., Huang, J., Feng, Q., Yin, D., Winter wheat yield prediction at county level and uncertainty analysis in main wheat-producing regions of China with deep learning approaches (2020) Remote Sens, 12, p. 1744; Haider, S.A., Naqvi, S.R., Akram, T., Umar, G.A., Shahzad, A., Sial, M.R., Khaliq, S., Kamran, M., LSTM neural network based forecasting model for wheat production in Pakistan (2019) Agronomy, 9, p. 72; Kolotii, A., Kussul, N., Shelestov, A., Skakun, S., Yailymov, B., Basarab, R., Lavreniuk, M., Ostapenko, V., Comparison of biophysical and satellite predictors for wheat yield forecasting in ukraine (2015) Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci, XL-7, pp. 39-44. , W3; Cai, Y., Guan, K., Lobell, D., Potgieter, A.B., Wang, S., Peng, J., Xu, T., You, L., Integrating satellite and climate data to predict wheat yield in Australia using machine learning approaches (2019) Agric. For. Meteorol, 274, pp. 144-159; Landau, S., Mitchell, R., Barnett, V., Colls, J., Craigon, J., Payne, R., A parsimonious, multiple-regression model of wheat yield response to environment (2000) Agric. For. Meteorol, 101, pp. 151-166; Kumar, S., Attri, S., Singh, K., Comparison of Lasso and stepwise regression technique for wheat yield prediction (2019) J. Agrometeorol, 21, pp. 188-192; Kogan, F., Kussul, N.N., Adamenko, T.I., Skakun, S.V., Kravchenko, A.N., Krivobok, A.A., Shelestov, A.Y., Lavrenyuk, A.N., Winter wheat yield forecasting: A comparative analysis of results of regression and biophysical models (2013) J. Autom. Inf. Sci, 45, pp. 68-81; Kamir, E., Waldner, F., Hochman, Z., Estimating wheat yields in Australia using climate records, satellite image time series and machine learning methods (2020) ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens, 160, pp. 124-135; Bali, N., Singla, A., Deep Learning Based Wheat Crop Yield Prediction Model in Punjab Region of North India (2021) Appl. Artif. Intell, pp. 1-25; Liaghat, S., Balasundram, S.K., A review: The role of remote sensing in precision agriculture (2010) Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci, 5, pp. 50-55; Ozdogan, M., Yang, Y., Allez, G., Cervantes, C., Remote sensing of irrigated agriculture: Opportunities and challenges (2010) Remote Sens, 2, pp. 2274-2304; Nelson, R., Kokic, P., Crimp, S., Meinke, H., Howden, S., The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: Part I—Conceptualising and measuring vulnerability (2010) Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, pp. 8-17; Luo, Q., Bellotti, W., Williams, M., Wang, E., Adaptation to climate change of wheat growing in South Australia: Analysis of management and breeding strategies (2009) Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 129, pp. 261-267; Luo, Q., Bellotti, W., Williams, M., Bryan, B., Potential impact of climate change on wheat yield in South Australia (2005) Agric. For. Meteorol, 132, pp. 273-285; Tikhamarine, Y., Malik, A., Kumar, A., Souag-Gamane, D., Kisi, O., Estimation of monthly reference evapotranspiration using novel hybrid machine learning approaches (2019) Hydrol. Sci. J, 64, pp. 1824-1842; Gundoshmian, T.M., Ardabili, S., Mosavi, A., Várkonyi-Kóczy, A.R., Prediction of combine harvester performance using hybrid machine learning modeling and response surface methodology (2019) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Global Research and Education, pp. 345-360. , Inter-Academia Budapest, Hungary, 4–7 September 2019; Shin, J.-Y., Kim, K.R., Ha, J.-C., Seasonal forecasting of daily mean air temperatures using a coupled global climate model and machine learning algorithm for field-scale agricultural management (2020) Agric. For. Meteorol, 281, p. 107858; Kabir, M.M., Shahjahan, M., Murase, K., A new hybrid ant colony optimization algorithm for feature selection (2012) Expert Syst. Appl, 39, pp. 3747-3763; Too, J., Abdullah, A.R., Chaotic atom search optimization for feature selection (2020) Arab. J. Sci. Eng, 45, pp. 6063-6079; Abualigah, L.M., Khader, A.T., Hanandeh, E.S., A new feature selection method to improve the document clustering using particle swarm optimization algorithm (2018) J. Comput. Sci, 25, pp. 456-466; Wang, Y., Yuan, Z., Liu, H., Xing, Z., Ji, Y., Li, H., Fu, Q., Mo, C., A new scheme for probabilistic forecasting with an ensemble model based on CEEMDAN and AM-MCMC and its application in precipitation forecasting (2022) Expert Syst. Appl, 187, p. 115872; Ghali, U.M., Usman, A., Degm, M.A.A., Alsharksi, A.N., Naibi, A.M., Abba, S., Applications of artificial intelligence-based models and multi-linear regression for the prediction of thyroid stimulating hormone level in the human body (2020) Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol, 29, pp. 3690-3699; Ali, M., Prasad, R., Xiang, Y., Yaseen, Z.M., Complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition hybridized with random forest and kernel ridge regression model for monthly rainfall forecasts (2020) J. Hydrol, 584, p. 124647; Kisi, O., Parmar, K.S., Application of least square support vector machine and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in long term prediction of river water pollution (2016) J. Hydrol, 534, pp. 104-112; Zhao, P., Xia, J., Dai, Y., He, J., Wind speed prediction using support vector regression (2015) Proceedings of the 2010 5th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 882-886. , Auckland, New Zealand, 15–17 June; Naik, J., Satapathy, P., Dash, P., Short-term wind speed and wind power prediction using hybrid empirical mode decomposition and kernel ridge regression (2018) Appl. Soft Comput, 70, pp. 1167-1188; Li, T., Zhou, Y., Li, X., Wu, J., He, T., Forecasting daily crude oil prices using improved CEEMDAN and ridge regression-based predictors (2019) Energies, 12, p. 3603; Santhosh, M., Venkaiah, C., Kumar, D.V., Ensemble empirical mode decomposition based adaptive wavelet neural network method for wind speed prediction (2018) Energy Convers. Manag, 168, pp. 482-493; Liang, T., Xie, G., Fan, S., Meng, Z., A Combined Model Based on CEEMDAN, Permutation Entropy, Gated Recurrent Unit Network, and an Improved Bat Algorithm for Wind Speed Forecasting (2020) IEEE Access, 8, pp. 165612-165630; Jin, T., Li, Q., Mohamed, M.A., A novel adaptive EEMD method for switchgear partial discharge signal denoising (2019) IEEE Access, 7, pp. 58139-58147; Zhang, W., Qu, Z., Zhang, K., Mao, W., Ma, Y., Fan, X., A combined model based on CEEMDAN and modified flower pollination algorithm for wind speed forecasting (2017) Energy Convers. Manag, 136, pp. 439-451. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.022; Torres, M.E., Colominas, M.A., Schlotthauer, G., Flandrin, P., A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (2011) Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 4144-4147. , Prague, Czech Republic, 22–27 May; Ahmed, M., Deo, R.C., Raj, N., Ghahramani, A., Feng, Q., Yin, Z., Yang, L., Deep Learning Forecasts of Soil Moisture: Convolutional Neural Network and Gated Recurrent Unit Models Coupled with Satellite-Derived MODIS, Observations and Synoptic-Scale Climate Index Data (2021) Remote Sens, 13, p. 554; Al-Tashi, Q., Kadir, S.J.A., Rais, H.M., Mirjalili, S., Alhussian, H., Binary optimization using hybrid grey wolf optimization for feature selection (2019) IEEE Access, 7, pp. 39496-39508; Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R., Particle swarm optimization (1995) Proceedings of the ICNN′95—International Conference on Neural Networks, , Perth, WA, Australia, 27 November–1 December; Roy, D.K., Lal, A., Sarker, K.K., Saha, K.K., Datta, B., Optimization algorithms as training approaches for prediction of reference evapotranspiration using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (2021) Agric. Water Manag, 255, p. 107003; Sun, L., Song, X., Chen, T., An improved convergence particle swarm optimization algorithm with random sampling of control parameters (2019) J. Control. Sci. Eng, 2019, p. 7478498; Zhao, W., Wang, L., Zhang, Z., Atom search optimization and its application to solve a hydrogeologic parameter estimation problem (2019) Knowl. Based Syst, 163, pp. 283-304; Mirjalili, S., Lewis, A., S-shaped versus V-shaped transfer functions for binary particle swarm optimization (2013) Swarm Evol. Comput, 9, pp. 1-14; Dorigo, M., Di Caro, G., Ant colony optimization: A new meta-heuristic (1999) Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406), pp. 1470-1477. , Washington, DC, USA, 6–9 July; Ahmed, M., Deo, R., Feng, Q., Ghahramani, A., Raj, N., Yin, Z., Yang, L., Hybrid deep learning method for a week-ahead evapotranspiration forecasting (2022) Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess, 36, pp. 831-849; Sweetlin, J.D., Nehemiah, H.K., Kannan, A., Feature selection using ant colony optimization with tandem-run recruitment to diagnose bronchitis from CT scan images (2017) Comput. Methods Programs Biomed, 145, pp. 115-125; Abba, S., Hadi, S.J., Abdullahi, J., River water modelling prediction using multi-linear regression, artificial neural network, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system techniques (2017) Procedia Comput. Sci, 120, pp. 75-82; Yang, P., Xia, J., Zhang, Y., Hong, S., Temporal and spatial variations of precipitation in Northwest China during 1960–2013 (2017) Atmos. Res, 183, pp. 283-295. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.09.014; Belayneh, A., Adamowski, J., Standard precipitation index drought forecasting using neural networks, wavelet neural networks, and support vector regression (2012) Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput, 2012, p. 6; Deo, R.C., Wen, X., Qi, F., A wavelet-coupled support vector machine model for forecasting global incident solar radiation using limited meteorological dataset (2016) Appl. Energy, 168, pp. 568-593. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.130; Dhiman, H.S., Deb, D., Guerrero, J.M., Hybrid machine intelligent SVR variants for wind forecasting and ramp events (2019) Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 108, pp. 369-379; Dodangeh, E., Panahi, M., Rezaie, F., Lee, S., Bui, D.T., Lee, C.-W., Pradhan, B., Novel hybrid intelligence models for flood-susceptibility prediction: Meta optimization of the GMDH and SVR models with the genetic algorithm and harmony search (2020) J. Hydrol, 590, p. 125423; Baydaroğlu, Ö., Koçak, K., SVR-based prediction of evaporation combined with chaotic approach (2014) J. Hydrol, 508, pp. 356-363. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.008; Khosla, E., Dharavath, R., Priya, R., Crop yield prediction using aggregated rainfall-based modular artificial neural networks and support vector regression (2020) Environ. Dev. Sustain, 22, pp. 5687-5708; Jaikla, R., Auephanwiriyakul, S., Jintrawet, A., Rice yield prediction using a support vector regression method (2008) Proceedings of the 2008 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, pp. 29-32. , Chiang Rai, Thailand, 14–17 May; Breiman, L., Random Forests (2001) Mach. Learn, 45, pp. 5-32; Jui, S.J.J., Ahmed, A.A.M., Bose, A., Raj, N., Sharma, E., Soar, J., Chowdhury, M.W.I., Spatiotemporal Hybrid Random Forest Model for Tea Yield Prediction Using Satellite-Derived Variables (2022) Remote Sens, 14, p. 805. , https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030805; Prasad, N., Patel, N., Danodia, A., Crop yield prediction in cotton for regional level using random forest approach (2021) Spat. Inf. Res, 29, pp. 195-206; Zhao, Y., Potgieter, A.B., Zhang, M., Wu, B., Hammer, G.L., Predicting wheat yield at the field scale by combining high-resolution Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and crop modelling (2020) Remote Sens, 12, p. 1024; (2020) Agricultural Commodities, Australia, 2019–2020 Financial Year, , https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/agriculture/agricultural-commodities-australia/latest-release, (accessed on 25 December 2021); Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (2021), https://www.awe.gov.au/abares/research-topics/agricultural-outlook/australian-crop-report/overview, National Overview—DAWE. (accessed on 25 December 2021); Wang, B., Chen, C., Li Liu, D., Asseng, S., Yu, Q., Yang, X., Effects of climate trends and variability on wheat yield variability in eastern Australia (2015) Clim. Res, 64, pp. 173-186; Lehtonen, R., Pahkinen, E., (2004) Practical Methods for Design and Analysis of Complex Surveys, , John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA; (2022) Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment-ABARES, , https://www.awe.gov.au/abares, (accessed on 25 December 2021); Doraiswamy, P.C., Moulin, S., Cook, P.W., Stern, A., Crop yield assessment from remote sensing (2003) Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens, 69, pp. 665-674; Ahmed, A.A.M., Ahmed, M.H., Saha, S.K., Ahmed, O., Sutradhar, A., (2021) Optimization Algorithms as Training Approach with Deep Learning Methods to Develop an Ultraviolet Index Forecasting Model, , https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354741827_Optimization_Algorithms_As_Training_Approach_With_Deep_Learning_Methods_To_Develop_An_Ultraviolet_Index_Forecasting_Model, (accessed on 20 December 2021); Teng, W., de Jeu, R., Doraiswamy, P., Kempler, S., Mladenova, I., Shannon, H., Improving world agricultural supply and demand estimates by integrating NASA remote sensing soil moisture data into USDA world agricultural outlook board decision making environment (2010) Proceedings of the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2010 Annual Conference, , San Diego, CA, USA, 26–30 April; Sohrabinia, M., Khorshiddoust, A.M., Application of satellite data and GIS in studying air pollutants in Tehran (2007) Habitat Int, 31, pp. 268-275. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.02.003; Guan, K., Berry, J.A., Zhang, Y., Joiner, J., Guanter, L., Badgley, G., Lobell, D.B., Improving the monitoring of crop productivity using spaceborne solar-induced fluorescence (2016) Glob. Chang. Biol, 22, pp. 716-726; Kramer, O., Scikit-learn (2016) Machine Learning for Evolution Strategies, pp. 45-53. , Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Dubourg, V., Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python (2011) J. Mach. Learn. Res, 12, pp. 2825-2830; Barrett, P., Hunter, J., Miller, J.T., Hsu, J.-C., Greenfield, P., matplotlib--A Portable Python Plotting Package (2004) Proceedings of the Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, p. 91. , Pasadena, CA, USA, 24–27 October; Waskom, M., Botvinnik, O., Ostblom, J., Gelbart, M., Lukauskas, S., Hobson, P., Gemperline, D.C., Cole, J.B., Mwaskom/Seaborn: v0. 10.1 (April 2020) (2020), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020zndo…3767070W%2F/abstract, Zenodo. (accessed on 25 December 2021); Krause, P., Boyle, D., Bäse, F., Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment (2005) Adv. Geosci, 5, pp. 89-97; Gandomi, A.H., Yun, G.J., Alavi, A.H., An evolutionary approach for modeling of shear strength of RC deep beams (2013) Mater. Struct, 46, pp. 2109-2119. , https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0039-z; Samui, P., Dixon, B., Application of support vector machine and relevance vector machine to determine evaporative losses in reservoirs (2012) Hydrol. Processes, 26, pp. 1361-1369; Deo, R.C., Samui, P., Kim, D., Estimation of monthly evaporative loss using relevance vector machine, extreme learning machine and multivariate adaptive regression spline models (2015) Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess, 30, pp. 1769-1784. , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1153-y; Baez-Gonzalez, A.D., Kiniry, J.R., Maas, S.J., Tiscareno, M.L., Macias, C.J., Mendoza, J.L., Richardson, C.W., Manjarrez, J.R., Large-area maize yield forecasting using leaf area index based yield model (2005) Agron. J, 97, pp. 418-425; Huang, J., Tian, L., Liang, S., Ma, H., Becker-Reshef, I., Huang, Y., Su, W., Wu, W., Improving winter wheat yield estimation by assimilation of the leaf area index from Landsat TM and MODIS data into the WOFOST model (2015) Agric. For. Meteorol, 204, pp. 106-121; Sagan, V., Maimaitijiang, M., Bhadra, S., Maimaitiyiming, M., Brown, D.R., Sidike, P., Fritschi, F.B., Field-scale crop yield prediction using multi-temporal WorldView-3 and PlanetScope satellite data and deep learning (2021) ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens, 174, pp. 265-281; Shetty, S.A., Padmashree, T., Sagar, B., Cauvery, N., Performance analysis on machine learning algorithms with deep learning model for crop yield prediction (2021) Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics, pp. 739-750. , Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; Son, N., Chen, C., Chen, C., Minh, V., Trung, N., A comparative analysis of multitemporal MODIS EVI and NDVI data for large-scale rice yield estimation (2014) Agric. For. Meteorol, 197, pp. 52-64; Satir, O., Berberoglu, S., Crop yield prediction under soil salinity using satellite derived vegetation indices (2016) Field Crops Res, 192, pp. 134-143; Schwalbert, R.A., Amado, T., Corassa, G., Pott, L.P., Prasad, P.V., Ciampitti, I.A., Satellite-based soybean yield forecast: Integrating machine learning and weather data for improving crop yield prediction in southern Brazil (2020) Agric. For. Meteorol, 284, p. 107886; Zhang, Y., Chipanshi, A., Daneshfar, B., Koiter, L., Champagne, C., Davidson, A., Reichert, G., Bédard, F., Effect of using crop specific masks on earth observation based crop yield forecasting across Canada (2019) Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ, 13, pp. 121-137; Shao, Y., Campbell, J.B., Taff, G.N., Zheng, B., An analysis of cropland mask choice and ancillary data for annual corn yield forecasting using MODIS data (2015) Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf, 38, pp. 78-87; Nevavuori, P., Narra, N., Lipping, T., Crop yield prediction with deep convolutional neural networks (2019) Comput. Electron. Agric, 163, p. 104859; Van Klompenburg, T., Kassahun, A., Catal, C., Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review (2020) Comput. Electron. Agric, 177, p. 105709
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Wheat dominates the Australian grain production market and accounts for 10–15% of the world’s 100 million tonnes annual global wheat trade. Accurate wheat yield prediction is critical to satisfying local consumption and increasing exports regionally and globally to meet human food security. This paper incorporates remote satellite-based information in a wheat-growing region in South Australia to estimate the yield by integrating the kernel ridge regression (KRR) method coupled with complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) and the grey wolf optimisation (GWO). The hybrid model, ‘GWO-CEEMDAN-KRR,’ employing an initial pool of 23 different satellite-based predictors, is seen to outperform all the benchmark models and all the feature selection (ant colony, atom search, and particle swarm optimisation) methods that are implemented using a set of carefully screened satellite variables and a feature decomposition or CEEMDAN approach. A suite of statistical metrics and infographics comparing the pre-dicted and measured yield shows a model prediction error that can be reduced by ~20% by employing the proposed GWO-CEEMDAN-KRR model. With the metrics verifying the accuracy of simulations, we also show that it is possible to optimise the wheat yield to achieve agricultural profits by quantifying and including the effects of satellite variables on potential yield. With further improvements in the proposed methodology, the GWO-CEEMDAN-KRR model can be adopted in agricultural yield simulation that requires remote sensing data to establish the relationships between crop health, yield, and other productivity features to support precision agriculture. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
AB - Wheat dominates the Australian grain production market and accounts for 10–15% of the world’s 100 million tonnes annual global wheat trade. Accurate wheat yield prediction is critical to satisfying local consumption and increasing exports regionally and globally to meet human food security. This paper incorporates remote satellite-based information in a wheat-growing region in South Australia to estimate the yield by integrating the kernel ridge regression (KRR) method coupled with complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) and the grey wolf optimisation (GWO). The hybrid model, ‘GWO-CEEMDAN-KRR,’ employing an initial pool of 23 different satellite-based predictors, is seen to outperform all the benchmark models and all the feature selection (ant colony, atom search, and particle swarm optimisation) methods that are implemented using a set of carefully screened satellite variables and a feature decomposition or CEEMDAN approach. A suite of statistical metrics and infographics comparing the pre-dicted and measured yield shows a model prediction error that can be reduced by ~20% by employing the proposed GWO-CEEMDAN-KRR model. With the metrics verifying the accuracy of simulations, we also show that it is possible to optimise the wheat yield to achieve agricultural profits by quantifying and including the effects of satellite variables on potential yield. With further improvements in the proposed methodology, the GWO-CEEMDAN-KRR model can be adopted in agricultural yield simulation that requires remote sensing data to establish the relationships between crop health, yield, and other productivity features to support precision agriculture. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
KW - Kernel ridge regression
KW - Machine learning
KW - Satellite data
KW - South Australia
KW - Wheat yield
KW - Agricultural machinery
KW - Ant colony optimization
KW - Commerce
KW - Food supply
KW - Forecasting
KW - Grain (agricultural product)
KW - Particle swarm optimization (PSO)
KW - Regression analysis
KW - Remote sensing
KW - Adaptive noise
KW - Empirical Mode Decomposition
KW - Gray wolves
KW - Kernel ridge regressions
KW - Optimisations
KW - Regression modelling
KW - Yield prediction
KW - Satellites
U2 - 10.3390/rs14051136
DO - 10.3390/rs14051136
M3 - Article
VL - 14
JO - Remote Sensing
JF - Remote Sensing
SN - 2072-4292
IS - 5
ER -