Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Exercise Capacity Trajectory: Implications for Subclinical Heart Failure Staging Criteria

Julian W. Sacre, Chiew Wong, Yih Kai Chan, Melinda J. Carrington, Simon Stewart, Bronwyn A. Kingwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the association of stage B heart failure (SBHF) and its constituent left ventricular (LV) abnormalities with trajectory of exercise capacity over time, and assess whether this association is modified by reversion of these LV abnormalities to normal. Background: The LV abnormalities of SBHF may coincide with a reduction in exercise capacity that precedes the overt exercise intolerance of clinical heart failure (HF). Determining the predictive capacity of established and novel SBHF criteria for exercise capacity decline may improve HF risk stratification. Methods: LV structure/function (echocardiography) and exercise capacity (6-min walk distance [6MWD]) were assessed at baseline and 3-year follow-up in 268 patients from the NIL-CHF (Nurse-led Intervention for Less Chronic Heart Failure) study (all stage A [SAHF] or SBHF). Changes (Δ) in 6MWD were compared between SAHF and SBHF and across each of 4 constituent components of SBHF: LV hypertrophy, regional wall motion abnormality(ies) (RWMA), left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) (ejection fraction <45%) and elevated early diastolic filling/annular velocity ratio (E/e’ ≥15). Results: Δ6MWD was similar in those with SAHF (n = 141) and SBHF (n = 127; −5 m [95% confidence interval (CI): −21 to +11 m]; covariate-adjusted). However, within the setting of SBHF there was substantive heterogeneity; that is, reductions in 6MWD were observed with persistent elevated E/e’ (−34 m [95% CI: −62 to −6 m]) and persistent LVSD (−41 m [95% CI: −74 to −8 m]), but not with LV hypertrophy (+17 m [95% CI: −15 to +49 m) or RWMA (+5 m [−27 to +36 m]), nor in patients whose elevated E/e’ or LVSD reverted to normal by 3 years (p > 0.10). Conclusions: Elevated E/e’ is associated with a similar degree of exercise capacity decline to LVSD, supporting that both LV functional criteria be considered in distinguishing SBHF from SAHF. That reversion of either manifestation of LV dysfunction was associated with preserved exercise capacity advocates targeting of these factors by HF preventive interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)798-806
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • echocardiography
  • exercise test
  • physical fitness
  • risk factors
  • ventricular dysfunction

Cite this