Lessons from conducting mixed methods research prevalence studies: Recommendations for overcoming the challenges of inconsistent reporting

Jennifer Kosiol, Ingy Shafei, Maryam Sassoli, Roslyn Cameron, Anneke Fitzgerald

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter introduces mixed methods research (MMR) prevalence studies, their value to the MMR scholarly community and disciplines, and the challenges associated with undertaking such studies. MMR prevalence studies provide an indication as to the frequency at which MMR studies are being reported within discipline-specific literature which, over time, demonstrates the utility and acceptance of MMR within a discipline. However, as MMR studies are
increasingly being reported, it is also notable that there are many inconsistencies in reporting (Skivington et al., 2021). To better understand how to overcome these inconsistencies and challenges, we draw upon an MMR prevalence study we conducted in the field of health management.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Mixed Methods Research in Business and Management
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Chapter14
Pages207-222
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781800887954
ISBN (Print)9781800887947
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons from conducting mixed methods research prevalence studies: Recommendations for overcoming the challenges of inconsistent reporting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this