Abstract
This paper provides an alternative to Rawlsian public reason liberalism and the constraints it imposes on religious reasoning in debates on public bioethics: the conscientious engagement model from the Reformational tradition. First, it explains the Rawlsian concept of liberal restraint on religious public reasoning for coercive laws and discusses objections to this concept. Using this as a frame, it then presents a case study of euthanasia and assisted suicide (eas) in the Netherlands and the advocacy of faith-based organizations (fbo s) to prevent a new legal framework for eas for nonmedical reasons through the Completed Life Bill (2020). Lastly, it examines the Christian imperative and explores the anthropological notion of embodiment as a basis for bioethical policy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Philosophia Reformata |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Christian imperative
- Completed Life Bill
- conscientious engagement model
- consensus model
- embodiment
- euthanasia and assisted suicide
- faith-based organizations
- Reformational tradition
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public and Faithful: On the Liberal State and Ethics of Citizenship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver