Researching the future: Method or madness?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the methodological issues behind futures studies, questioning whether it is possible to claim a futures study as methodologically 'sound', and critiquing how futures methodology fits within the methodological paradigms currently recognised in the research field. The extent to which futures methodology can be considered a paradigm in its own right is also examined as are the assumptive foundations of futures studies. While all the evidence raises many questions as to the form of futures methodology, the lack of clarity does not make a futures study invalid or unreliable, and hence sensemaking from the chaos of futures 'data' does ensure that futures studies can be based on method rather than madness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1041-1054
Number of pages14
JournalFutures
Volume35
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Researching the future: Method or madness?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this