Stigmatized for standing up for my child: A qualitative study of non-vaccinating parents in Australia

Kerrie E. Wiley, Julie Leask, Katie Attwell, Catherine Helps, Lesley Barclay, Paul R. Ward, Stacy M. Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Vaccine refusal is highly polarizing in Australia, producing a challenging social landscape for non-vaccinating parents. We sought to understand the lived experience of non-vaccinating parents in contemporary Australia. Methods: We recruited a national sample of non-vaccinating parents of children <18 yrs, advertising on national radio, in playgrounds in low vaccination areas, and using snowballing. Grounded Theory methodology guided data collection (via semi-structured interviews). Inductive analysis identified stigmatization as a central concept; stigma theory was adopted as an analytical lens. Results: Twenty-one parents from regional and urban locations in five states were interviewed. Parent's described experiences point to systematic stigmatization which can be characterized using Link & Phelan's five-step process. Parents experienced (1) labelling and (2) stereotyping, with many not identifying with the “anti-vaxxers” portrayed in the media and describing frustration at being labelled as such, believing they were defending their child from harm. Participants described (3) social “othering”, leading to relationship loss and social isolation, and (4) status loss and discrimination, feeling “brushed off” as incompetent parents and discriminated against by medical professionals and other parents. Finally, (5) legislative changes exerted power over their circumstances, rendering them unable to provide their children with the same financial and educational opportunities as vaccinated children, often increasing their steadfastness in refusing vaccination. Conclusion: Non-vaccinating Australian parents feel stigmatized for defending their child from perceived risk of harm, reporting a range of social and psychological effects, as well as financial effects from policies which disadvantaged their children through differential financial treatment, and diminished early childhood educational opportunities. While it might be argued that social stigma and exclusionary policies directed a small minority for the greater good are justified, other more nuanced approaches based on better understandings of vaccine rejection could achieve comparable public health outcomes without the detrimental effect on unvaccinated families.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100926
JournalSSM - Population Health
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Childhood vaccination
  • Immunization
  • Public health
  • Qualitative research
  • Stigma
  • Vaccine refusal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stigmatized for standing up for my child: A qualitative study of non-vaccinating parents in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this