Abstract
The model of the flexible firm, developed by John Atkinson, has been very influential over the last decade. The model is superficially appealing as an explanation for the widespread growth in non-standard employment across many OECD economies, including Australia. This article examines the model as an explanation for workforce restructuring, including in particular the growth of non-standard employment. The details and structure of the model are examined. The ensuing debate and conflict of evidence in both Britain and Australia is reviewed. The article concludes that it is difficult to utilise the model as a credible research tool.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 85-102 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Labour & Industry |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 |
