TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of visceral techniques in Australian osteopathic practice
T2 - A descriptive cross-sectional study
AU - Fleischmann, Michael
AU - Vaughan, Brett
AU - Grace, Sandra
AU - Stewart, Alexander
AU - Hart, Charlotte
AU - Brew, Elizabeth
AU - Masters, Georgette
AU - Smeeton, Lachlan
AU - Thompson, Lydia
AU - Brooks, Megan
N1 - Funding Information:
The ORION project is funded by Osteopathy Australia. The funding source had no influence in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. The research reported in this paper is the sole responsibility of the authors and reflects the independent ideas and scholarship of the authors alone. The authors would also like to thank Professor Jon Adams, Dr Amie Steel and Dr Wenbo Peng from the Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney for their input into the initial stages of the analysis and data interpretation of the ORION dataset.
Funding Information:
The ORION project is funded by Osteopathy Australia. The funding source had no influence in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. The research reported in this paper is the sole responsibility of the authors and reflects the independent ideas and scholarship of the authors alone.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background Visceral techniques have taken their place in the established osteopathic treatment approaches, however, very little research exists on their use in clinical settings in Australia. This study reports on the prevalence, enablers of and barriers to visceral technique use by registered osteopaths currently practising in Australia utilising a nationally representative database from the Osteopathy Research and Innovation Network (ORION). Methods The recruitment invitation pack for this study was distributed via email to the ORION database during July 2019. The study utilised a 27-item survey with both Likert scale and free text responses. All data were imported into the statistical software package SPSSTM 25 for descriptive statistical analysis. Results A total of 143 Australian osteopaths participated in the study representing a response rate of 14.4%. The participants reported a mean number of 16.1 years in practice, with 55.3% identifying as female and approximately 70% reporting as working from a metropolitan location. The majority of respondents (71.5%) reported using visceral techniques within the preceding 6 months, with 12.8% indicating that they had previously used visceral techniques in practice but had subsequently elected to stop using them. Key barriers identified by the study in relation to visceral technique usage related to practitioner knowledge, confidence and a perceived lack of support, while enablers were linked to perceived benefit in patient management and private payment. Conclusion This study provides an important step forward in our understanding of the current use of visceral techniques by the Australian osteopathic workforce. Further research is required to better understand practitioners’ rationale for including visceral techniques in practice, patient outcomes where visceral techniques are used, and the cost-effectiveness of their inclusion in patient care.
AB - Background Visceral techniques have taken their place in the established osteopathic treatment approaches, however, very little research exists on their use in clinical settings in Australia. This study reports on the prevalence, enablers of and barriers to visceral technique use by registered osteopaths currently practising in Australia utilising a nationally representative database from the Osteopathy Research and Innovation Network (ORION). Methods The recruitment invitation pack for this study was distributed via email to the ORION database during July 2019. The study utilised a 27-item survey with both Likert scale and free text responses. All data were imported into the statistical software package SPSSTM 25 for descriptive statistical analysis. Results A total of 143 Australian osteopaths participated in the study representing a response rate of 14.4%. The participants reported a mean number of 16.1 years in practice, with 55.3% identifying as female and approximately 70% reporting as working from a metropolitan location. The majority of respondents (71.5%) reported using visceral techniques within the preceding 6 months, with 12.8% indicating that they had previously used visceral techniques in practice but had subsequently elected to stop using them. Key barriers identified by the study in relation to visceral technique usage related to practitioner knowledge, confidence and a perceived lack of support, while enablers were linked to perceived benefit in patient management and private payment. Conclusion This study provides an important step forward in our understanding of the current use of visceral techniques by the Australian osteopathic workforce. Further research is required to better understand practitioners’ rationale for including visceral techniques in practice, patient outcomes where visceral techniques are used, and the cost-effectiveness of their inclusion in patient care.
KW - Osteopathic medicine
KW - Practice-based research network
KW - Visceral
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115756097&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aimed.2021.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.aimed.2021.07.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115756097
SN - 2212-9588
JO - Advances in Integrative Medicine
JF - Advances in Integrative Medicine
ER -