Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When the politics of contextuality (can) subvert science: A case study of Australian women’s perceptions of alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Alcohol has a dose-response relationship with breast cancer risk, yet awareness about this link is low among Australian women. This chapter illuminates tensions women experience in evaluating information about alcohol and breast cancer, drawn from 122 interviews with 59 women aged 25-64 with variable drinking levels and social class. Three strands were derived of how women navigate risk information about alcohol and breast cancer: (1) high levels of specificity about the science linking alcohol to breast cancer are desired, which integrates information calibrated to specific lifestyle and bespoke genetic profiles; (2) uncertainties were identified in the complex processes of generating scientific evidence about the link and communicating it clearly; and (3) relative ambivalence regarding the value of (or possibility for) objectivity within experts and expertise. These three strands are theorised as a “politics of contextuality”, which weaves together uncertainties within the evidence and its communication with ignorance and nonknowledge - and effectively buffers against the usefulness of experts and expert-derived information. Rather than pejoratively using the word “ignorance” the affordances it provides in wading through the co-existing risks of contemporary life are attended to - in order to create space for imagining how “Expertise for a New World” could respond.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPhilosophy, Expertise, and the Myth of Neutrality
PublisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
Pages238-256
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781040003237
ISBN (Print)9781032449159
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  3. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  4. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  5. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  6. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  7. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  8. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When the politics of contextuality (can) subvert science: A case study of Australian women’s perceptions of alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this